It works well in Sweden, Norway and Iceland (plus probably a few more), but sucks in Finland and numerous other countries. It all depends on what type of architecture the health care system is designed for and placed upon. The designs for health care can vary a lot depending on cultural, economic and other conditions and thus give different results on different environments: For example in Finland the birthrate has been declining for years (currently at 1,7 per woman) and with large age groups starting to reach retirement age, it has started to considerably slow down the Finnish health care system.
I'm not against nationalized health care, but i can't say i would recommend it for United States, not without first solving prison overpopulation and crime rate related problems.
1 comment:
It works well in Sweden, Norway and Iceland (plus probably a few more), but sucks in Finland and numerous other countries. It all depends on what type of architecture the health care system is designed for and placed upon. The designs for health care can vary a lot depending on cultural, economic and other conditions and thus give different results on different environments: For example in Finland the birthrate has been declining for years (currently at 1,7 per woman) and with large age groups starting to reach retirement age, it has started to considerably slow down the Finnish health care system.
I'm not against nationalized health care, but i can't say i would recommend it for United States, not without first solving prison overpopulation and crime rate related problems.
Post a Comment